The Case to Tag TV Spots with URLs

TV on the Internet

The next time you’re watching live TV, pay attention to the ending of commercials. What you’ll find are an increasing number of them tagged with a URL, or even better, a URL with voice-over to go online. This is certainly not new news as it was estimated that during the 2008 Super Bowl, 64% of commercials included a website address.

But why not 100%? One of the most common reasons I’ve heard is:

“We want to drive people in-store. We don’t want to confuse the message by driving them to the web.”

Yet, consider the fact that:

Since it is unlikely that, upon seeing a TV spot, a viewer will immediately get up off their couch and head into the respective store/restaurant/business to make a purchase, why not harness the momentum of their piqued interest and reinforce their consideration?

Television and the web will only continue to converge:

Driving to the web from TV can only amplify your message and, if done well, marry TV and web in a way that’s greater than the sum of their individual parts. It’s the 1+1=3 media effect in action.

As for the future? If the Vitamin Water TV spot featuring Kobe Bryant vs. Lebron James is any indication, brands will start to favor directing TV viewers to their social media properties over their corporate websites.

Mike edited and adapted this post from his original blog post on Harmonic Aftershock. Image source: iStockphoto.com

Related Posts with Thumbnails


One Response to “The Case to Tag TV Spots with URLs”

  1. [...] post: Hill Holliday Blog » The Case to Tag TV Spots with URLs Comments [...]

Leave a Comment